Cuisinart Elemental 13-cup Food Processor With Spiralizer Reviews
Cuisinart Elemental 13-Loving cup Review
An excellent model if you are planning on frequently making dough or mayo
Price: $200 Listing | $199.95 at Amazon
Pros: Good at mixing and shredding
Cons: Average at chopping, little harder to clean
Manufacturer: Cuisinart
Our Editors independently research, exam, and rate the all-time products. Nosotros only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Acquire more than
Our Verdict
The Cuisinart Elemental 13-Cup is a standard food processor that scored in the middle of the pack and has a toll range to friction match. While this model didn't deliver any astonishing results in our rating metrics, it also didn't disappoint. It scored particularly well in the mixing and shredding metrics and but had a few minor drawbacks when it came to ease of cleaning.
Compare to Similar Products
| This Product | Vitamix 12-Loving cup Attachment | Cuisinart Custom 14 | Ninja Professional Food Processor | Hamilton Embankment 10-Cup | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awards |  |  | | | |
| Toll | $200 List $199.95 at Amazon | $200 List $161.60 at Amazon | $250 List $213.47 at Amazon | $100 Listing $99.99 at Amazon | $58 List $57.99 at Amazon |
Overall Score | |||||
| Star Rating | |||||
| Pros | Proficient at mixing and shredding | Great for pizza dough, pureeing perfection, easy to clean, mostly fifty-fifty slicing, piffling to no leakage | Slap-up at pureeing and slicing | Great for shredding, slicing, good at chopping | Great at pureeing, good at chopping, inexpensive |
| Cons | Average at chopping, little harder to make clean | Non great for absurdity, boilerplate chopping and shredding | No adjustability of shredding or slicing | Lilliputian more hard to make clean | Leaky, not the best at mixing, loud |
| Bottom Line | An excellent model if you are planning on frequently making dough or mayo | A food processor especially swell for pizza, that gets most jobs done at a reasonable price | One of the best food processors you can go on a budget without sacrificing besides much operation | Offering all-effectually fantabulous operation given its cost tag, this is ane of our favorites to anyone shopping for a bargain buy | For those trying to salve some dough, this inexpensive model volition go the job washed, specially when it comes to pureeing and chopping |
| Rating Categories | Cuisinart Elemental... | Vitamix 12-Cup Atta... | Cuisinart Custom 14 | Ninja Professional | Hamilton Embankment ten-Cup |
| Chopping (20%) | |||||
| Mixing (xx%) | |||||
| Pureeing (20%) | |||||
| Shredding (fifteen%) | |||||
| Slicing (15%) | |||||
| Cleaning (10%) | |||||
| Specs | Cuisinart Elemental... | Vitamix 12-Cup Atta... | Cuisinart Custom 14 | Ninja Professional | Hamilton Embankment 10-Cup |
| Model # | FP-13DGM | VM0215 | DFP-14BCNY | BN600/BN601 | 70730 |
| Bowl Size | 13 cup and iv cup mini bowl | 12 cup | 14 cup | 9 cup | 10 cup |
| Dimensions | West: 8.25" H: 16.five" D: 10" | Due west: eight.5" H: 12.eight" (no base) H: 19.half dozen" (on tested base of operations) D: 11.8" | Due west: 7.75" H: 15" D: 10.75" | West: 9.9" H: fifteen.6" D: 7.3" | W: 10.5" H: 15.five" D: viii.5" |
| Measured Weight of Base | five pounds, 9 ounces | 8 pounds, 12 ounces. Varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base of operations | 12 pounds, half dozen ounces | 4 pounds, eight ounces | 3 pounds, ane ounce |
| BPA Free | Yes | Aye | Yep | Yes | Aye |
| Motor | 550 Watt | Varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base | 720 Watt | 850 Watt | 450 Watt |
| Speed Control | High/Low/Pulse/Off | Pulse/(On/Off), varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base of operations | On/(Pulse/Off) | Chop/Puree/Dough/Disc/Low/High/Pulse | High/Low/Pulse/Off |
| String Storage | Internal | Underside cord wrap; varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base | None | External Cord Wrap | Internal |
| Feet | Smooth Rubber | Varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base | Smooth Rubber | Suction Cups | Suction Cups |
| Decibels at 3ft | 79 | fourscore.5, varies, tested with Vitamix A2300 blender base | 61.5 | 80 | 96 |
| Mini Bowl Blade | Yes | Due north/A | Yes | N/A | N/A |
| Accessory Storage Instance | Yes | Aye | No | No | No |
| Slicing Disc | Adjustable to 8mm | 2 discs large and small; Not adjustable | Not adjustable | Not adjustable | Not adjustable |
| Shredding Disc | Fine and Medium | 2 discs large and small; Non adjustable | Medium | Non adaptable | Medium |
| Dough Bract | Yes | No | No | Yep | No |
| Whipping Attatchment | No | No | No | No | No |
| Citrus Juicer | No | No | No | No | No |
| Dicing Kit | Yep, with a cleaning tool | No | No | No | No |
| Build in Bowl Scraper | No | No | No | No | Yeah |
| French Fry Disc | No | No | No | No | No |
| Julienne Disc | No | No | No | No | No |
Prove full specification details Hide full specification details
Our Analysis and Test Results
Performance Comparison
The Cuisinart Elemental scored in the center of the group.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Chopping
The Elemental ranked nearly average in our chopping metric. Nosotros chopped carrots, almonds, and onions to assess its performance, comparison the final production to the other nutrient processors. Nosotros too evaluated how long it took for the bract to stop spinning when the "Pulse" button was released, demonstrating the level of control y'all had. It did very well at chopping onions, earning the second-highest score of the group.
Some fantastic chopped onions produced by the Elemental, though not the best we saw.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Unfortunately, performance plummeted when chopping carrots, with this model tying for the lowest score. The carrots weren't very uniform, and we could not chop the remainder large pieces of carrots without over-processing a meaning portion of the carrots.
We got large chunks and mush instead of a uniform mix.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
The Elemental did recover slightly, doing about boilerplate at chopping almonds, like to the Black+Decker in chop quality, but created much, much less pulverized almond grit. This model did accept a brief moment for the blade to cease spinning when the button was released.
The mixing blade installed on the Elemental.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Mixing
The Elemental did better in our mixing metric, tying for the second-highest score of the group. Nosotros compared the quality of the mayonnaise, pie crust dough, and pizza dough produced past the machines to come up up with a concluding score, specially looking for signs of struggle and consistency. It successfully made our one cup mayo recipe without difficulty and produced a high-quality finished production, earning information technology full marks. This model also did a cracking job making pizza dough, only shaking a tiny bit while it was mixing. It did well at making pie crust, though not quite besides every bit pizza dough. The pie chaff actually got thrown against the side of the bowl and stuck there, resulting in a dough that had some dry out spots and some overly sticky spots when we rolled it out.
Pureeing
The Elemental's operation dropped slightly on our pureeing tests. We had a panel of tasters charge per unit and rank the hummus, applesauce, tomato sauce, and nut butter produced by each nutrient processor. We also tested whether or non each basin leaked when filled with water to the maximum fill up line, and the motor was run. The hummus tied for the third-best of the group with the Cuisinart Elite. The quality dropped a little when it came to applesauce, leaving some large chunks remaining and a production that was overall coarser than other models.
Information technology did even worse with the tomato sauce, creating a chunkier product. It also had a less than stellar functioning grinding nut butter, taking around 25 minutes and receiving the second-everyman score.
The shredding blade with two different sizes installed on the Elemental.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Shredding
Shredding was another i of the metrics that the Elemental scored very well in. Nosotros did a careful shred assay of the potatoes, cheese, and carrots that were sent through each automobile to determine scores, likewise as looking at whether or not you could accommodate the size of the shreds. This model has both fine and medium shred settings. It performed well shredding cheese, with a finished product that had very few crumbles and primarily cheese strands.
We did have to do some pocket-size trimming to the ii pound block of cheese to get it to fit in the feeding tube, and no chunks were left backside in the gap between the lid and shredding disc. The Elemental continued its solid performance when it came to shredding potatoes, producing some of the highest quality shreds we saw during testing.
This model produced excellent quality shredded potatoes.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
The shredded carrots weren't as well shabby either, and we were impressed during this test.
These carrots lacked the crispness of the pinnacle scoring models.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
The carrots didn't have any large chunks in them, just they weren't every bit crisp and as structurally audio as the shreds fabricated past some of the college performers.
Slicing
Delivering an in a higher place-average performance, the Elemental earned an above-average score. We sliced zucchini, potatoes, and tomatoes to appraise the aptitude of each model, likewise equally if it was possible to adjust the thickness of the slice on the slicing disc. The slicing blade was easy to adjust, with the numbers respective to the desired thickness in millimeters. Information technology did a fantastic task slicing tomatoes, though the feed tube wouldn't fit the largest lycopersicon esculentum nosotros had.
The even tomato slices created by the Elemental.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Quality dropped when information technology came to potatoes and zucchini, both ranking about average. In that location was a pocket-sized degree of taper on all of the potato slices. The zucchini slices exhibited a wide variation in size, and there was some tapering, but information technology did alright.
The parts of the Cuisinart Elemental drying after our cleaning test.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Cleaning
This model was one of the more than difficult to clean. The discs, blade, bowl, and lid are all dishwasher safe, though recommended for the top shelf only. The blade was piece of cake enough to make clean, peculiarly helped by its longer length, making it easier to concur on to when washing manually. The basin had some modest raised points to act every bit stops for the smaller basin that would catch food and exist very problematic to clean. The lid was even worse, with some fifty-fifty smaller spaces that would trap food and crusade countless frustration to clean.
The included accessories with the Elemental.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Value
This model is of an boilerplate value. Information technology scored fine, and we didn't balk at the price.
This middle-of-the-road food processor scored fine and had a reasonable price.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
Determination
All in all, you probably wouldn't be disappointed in this model, but you might not exist thrilled. It does come with the dicing zipper, which we did non test every bit we wouldn't be able to compare its performance to its peers. Y'all may be better served past other models that scored the aforementioned but were noticeably less expensive, just this production is one to consider.
The chopping blade installed on the Elemental.
Credit: Jenna Ammerman
— David Wise and Austin Palmer
bobbittpurpectiod.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.techgearlab.com/reviews/kitchen/food-processor/cuisinart-elemental-13-cup
0 Response to "Cuisinart Elemental 13-cup Food Processor With Spiralizer Reviews"
Post a Comment